

That's a dragon, and thus did some other term for a dragon come about. And people walked up to a culture and said ah, you to have a big vicious lizard beast. A whooooooooole lot of them and they had different words for them. What happened was various people have various legends around dragons. Wyvern is also a dragon, it's a type of dragon but still also a dragon. You could say drake and people knew that simply ment dragon. You're nitpicking.Īlso frankly Draconith remind me too much of certain things I'd see on the internet and I don't need that in my Warhammer.ĭrake really was just another word for dragon through out most of history. They all look like dragons, because they're all dragons. Also if you are happy with the awful dragons we have in the game thanks to GW good for you, I just don't like them and never will. It is more popular than warhammer so Like I said GW themselves realized their dragons are awful and is why they made the Draconith who do look like actual dragons. Neither is that Facebook game you played as a kid. World of Warcraft isn't authoritative, my dude. What I mean warhammer dragons don't have complex bodies that make them look like dragons, they just look like the lesser version at best which is a drake. You have the egg, the hatchling, the drake then the dragon. No a drake is not a synonym for a dragon.


I'm gonna guess this is trolling, but just to be clear: that "dragon chart" you probably found online one time is not based on anything other than personal opinion.
#Warhammer dragons manuals
Outside of DnD monster manuals and the like, a drake is just a synonym for a dragon. I was never a huge fan of the tabletop models, HOWEVER: It seems GW finally realized it too and is why they made the Draconith, who look much better. They look nothing like dragons, they look more like drakes at best (low texture drakes). I can't believe there are people who like how they look. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.846 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.
